Radiometric dating on fossils

Posted by / 04-Aug-2017 04:58

Below is a list of some dinosaur fossils and their dated ages from the Miller paper.

Are the dates beyond the range of testing technology?

No, the University of Georgia had extended the maximum limit up over 50,000 years, and the ages were all well below this. After all, even though these ages are much younger than conventional ages, many creationists believe life on earth to be much younger than even the reported carbon-14 ages of these dinosaur fossils.

Notice the titles of 4 and 6 correspond in both lists, which in the opinion of some, hints strongly that the list with number 5 present was an original list." href="#footnote5_xp23gjo"Why is the information presented in the paper important?

Accessed 2013 Oct" href="#footnote11_qqwr8d7"11 Soft tissue normally will deteriorate over time.

Soft tissue should not last 65 million years, yet it has been found in a dinosaur fossil which “has” to be at least that old.

The age for all these fossils was found to be less than 50,000 years1.

This is not predicted by conventional evolutionary theory; and other discoveries have been made concerning dinosaurs which also are not predicted by evolutionary theory such as the discovery of soft tissue in bones that are not or are only partially fossilized.

radiometric dating on fossils-48radiometric dating on fossils-6radiometric dating on fossils-66

Carbon-14’s half-life is too short to measure dates over a million years ago.